Tragic-Comedy
As the name implies, Tragic-Comedy is half
tragedy and half comedy, and is said to be mingled harmoniously together. It is
different from tragedy as it contains comic relief and from comedy that is said
to have potentially tragic background. It is a form by itself with a purpose of
its own.
The
comic relief in a tragedy serves only to deepen the tragic effect and does not
materially affect the tone of the play.
Example: 1. the function of Porter in Macbeth
is not to be a comic figure but to show his drunken garrulousness (the habit of talking a lot, especially about things that are not important) and ignorance in murdering Duncan actually heightens the audience
awareness of the horrible deed,
Grave-digger in hamlet
Fool in King Lear
All these comic characters are actually not
meant to evoke untroubled laughter as the comic characters usually do, but they
add their own queer (strange) fancies to the tragic theme.
A comedy with a tragic background similarly is
said to be more effective for example the wrongs done by the main characters at
the opening of the play, like in As You Like It, Much Ado About Nothing, they
make the story and it makes us feel happy when they are corrected during the
play.
But Tragic-Comedy stands on a different
footing altogether. It is a complete tragedy up to a certain point and a
completer comedy thereafter. The Complication (problem/obstacle) sets forth a
tragic theme, and the Denouement (falling action/final part) turns it into
comedy. We can say that the Rising action is tragedy and the falling action is
comedy. So it is the climax that separates one from the other. One of the best
examples of such dramas is Shakespeare’s Cymbeline, Winter’s Tale and The
Tempest. The unusual structure of this type of play gives different treatment
to its theme. The plot is not what one might expect in a tragedy or comedy but
it’s a tale that is mingled with weal(wound/scar) and woe(unhappiness) which
frequently verges (ends) on the improbable (something that is not true or
doesn’t happen).
The
characters again are not always on one plane (standards/stage/degree). Many
undergo a transformation, sometimes natural, sometimes rather forced, just
before the play closes. The supernatural and the pastoral are also freely
exploited.
Origin and History
Tragic-Comedy was unknown to the Greeks, whose
Unity of Action definitely forbade the mixture of the tragic and the comic
element. A comic Latin dramatist Plautus tried attempting something of this
sort in his play Amphitruo which he called a ‘tragico-comoedia,’ but that was
perhaps a mere(small) freak(unexpected) of genius and not the result of a deliberate
artistic aim.
The English form arose during the reign of
James I under Italian and Spanish influence, one was responsible for the
pastoral element and the other for the romantic intrigue, both of which are the
characteristic of the English Tragic-Comedy.
With numerous variations the dramatic romance
maintained itself on the stage till the closing of the theatres in 1642. After
which it was said to have disappeared, though the tragic-comic element became
indispensable (essential/necessary) to the Sentimental comedy of the 18th
century and the serious play of the modern times.
1.
Opposed by those who judged it by its principles and not its
perceptions. Sidney ruled it out he said that neither the admiration nor
sympathy/sorrow can be obtained by mixing tragedy and comedy (tragic-comedy) &
Milton condemned it, Addison called it one of the most monstrous inventions
that ever entered into poets thoughts. All these poets took a stand on the
classical principle and none of them explained why such mixture was unnatural.
2. Dryden supports it by saying that ‘we have invented,
increase and perfected a more pleasant way of writing for the stage, which is
ever known to the ancients or moderns of a nation that is Tragi-Comedy. Dr.
Johnson said ‘it may be allowed upon the stage, which pretends only to be the
mirror of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment