Sunday 4 March 2018

Tintern Abbey: William Wordsworth - Summary and Critical Analysis


Tintern Abbey: William Wordsworth - Summary and Critical Analysis

In the poem Tintern Abbey the poet has expressed his tender feeling towards nature. He has specially recollected his poetic idea of Tintern Abbey where he had gone first time in 1793. This is his second visit to this place. Wordsworth has expressed his intense faith in nature.
There is Wordsworth’s realization of God in nature. He got sensuous delight in it and it is all in all to him. Tintern Abbey impressed him most when he had first visited this place. He has again come to the same place where there are lofty cliffs, the plots of cottage ground, orchards groves and copses. He is glad to see again hedgerows, sportive wood, pastoral farms and green doors. This lonely place, the banks of the river and rolling waters from their mountain springs present a beautiful panoramic light. The solitary place remands the poet of vagrant dwellers and hermits’ cave.
The poem is in five sections. The first section establishes the setting for the meditation. But it emphasizes the passage of time: five years have passed, five summers, five long winters… But when the poet is back to this place of natural beauty and serenity, it is still essentially the same. The poem opens with a slow, dragging rhythm and the repetition of the word ‘five’ all designed to emphasize the weight of time which has separated the poet from this scene. The following lines develop a clear, visual picture of the scent. The view presented is a blend of wildness and order. He can see the entirely natural cliffs and waterfalls; he can see the hedges around the fields of the people; and he can see wreaths of smoke probably coming from some hermits making fire in their cave hermitages. These images evoke not only a pure nature as one might expect, they evoke a life of the common people in harmony with the nature.
 The second section begins with the meditation. The poet now realizes that these ‘beauteous’ forms have always been with him, deep-seated in his mind, wherever he went. This vision has been “Felt in the blood, and felt alone the heart” that is. It has affected his whole being. They were not absent from his mind like form the mind of a man born blind. In hours of weariness, frustration and anxiety, these things of nature used to make him feel sweet sensations in his very blood, and he used to feel it at the level of the impulse (heart) rather than in his waking consciousness and through reasoning. From this point onward Wordsworth begins to consider the sublime of nature, and his mystical awareness becomes clear. Wordsworth’s idea was that human beings are naturally uncorrupted.
The poet studies nature with open eyes and imaginative mind. He has been the lover of nature form the core of his heart, and with purer mind. He feels a sensation of love for nature in his blood. He feels high pleasure and deep power of joy in natural objects. The beatings of his heart are full of the fire of nature’s love. He concentrates attention to Sylvan Wye – a majestic and worth seeing river. He is reminded of the pictures of the past visit and ponders over his future years. On his first visit to this place he bounded over the mountains by the sides of the deep rivers and the lovely streams. In the past the soundings haunted him like a passion. The tall rock, the mountain and the deep and gloomy wood were then to him like an appetite. But that time is gone now. In nature he finds the sad music of humanity.
The third section contains a kind of doubt; the poet is probably reflecting the reader’s possible doubts so that he can go on to justify how he is right and what he means. He doubts, for just a moment, whether this thought about the influence of the nature is vain, but he can’t go on. He exclaims: “yet, oh! How often, amid the joyless daylight, fretful and unprofitable fever of the world have I turned to thee (nature)” for inspiration and peace of mind. He thanks the ‘Sylvan Wye’ for the everlasting influence it has imprinted on his mind; his spirit has very often turned to this river for inspiration when he was losing the peace of mind or the path and meaning of life. The river here becomes the symbol of spirituality.
 Though the poet has become serious and perplexed in the fourth section the nature gives him courage and spirit enough to stand there with a sense of delight and pleasure. This is so typical of Wordsworth that it seems he can’t write poetry without recounting his personal experiences, especially those of his childhood. Here he also begins from the earliest of his days! It was first the coarse pleasures in his ‘boyish days’, which have all gone by now. “That time is past and all its aching joys are now no more, and all its dizzy raptures”. But the poet does not mourn for them; he doesn’t even grumble about their loss. Clearly, he has gained something in return: “other gifts have followed; for such loss… for I have learnt to look on nature, not as in the hour of thoughtless youth; but hearing oftentimes the still, sad music of humanity”. This is a philosophic statement about maturing, about the development of personality, and of the poetic or philosophic mind as well. So now the poet is able to feel a joy of elevated thought, a sense sublime, and far more deeply interfused. He feels a sense of sublime and the working of a supreme power in the light of the setting sun, in round oceans and in the blue sky. He is of opinion that a motion and a spirit impel all thinking things. Therefore Wordsworth claims that he is a lover of the meadows and of all which we see from this green earth. Nature is a nurse, a guide and the guardian of his heart and soul. The poet comes to one important conclusion: for all the formative influences, he is now consciously in love with the nature. He has become a thoughtful lover of the meadows, the woods and the mountains. Though his ears and eyes seem to create the other half of all these sensations, the nature is the actual source of these sublime thoughts.
The fifth and last section continues with the same meditation from where the poet addresses his younger sister Dorothy, whom he blesses and gives advice about what he has learnt. He says that he can hear the voice of his own youth when he hears her speak, the language of his former heart; he can also “read my former pleasure in the soothing lights of thy wild eyes’. He is excited to look at his own youthful image in her. He says that nature has never betrayed his heart and that is why they had been living from joy to joy. Nature can impress the mind with quietness and beauty, and feed it lofty thoughts, that no evil tongues of the human society can corrupt their hearts with any amount of contact with it.
The poet then begins to address the moon in his reverie, and to ask the nature to bestow his sister with their blessings. Let the moon shine on her solitary walk, and let the mountain winds blow their breeze on her. When the present youthful ecstasies are over, as they did with him, let her mind become the palace of the lovely forms and thought about the nature, so that she can enjoy and understand life and overcome the vexations of living in a harsh human society. The conclusion to the poem takes us almost cyclically, back to a physical view of the ‘steep woods’, ‘lofty cliffs’ and ‘green pastoral landscape’ in which the meditation of the poem is happening.
The poet has expressed his honest and natural feelings to Nature’s Superiority. The language is so simple and lucid that one is not tired of reading it again and again. The sweetness of style touches the heart of a reader. This is the beauty of Wordsworth’s language.

The Quality of Mercy

The quality of mercy is not strained.
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven,
Upon the place beneath.
It is twice blessed.
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.
It is mightiest in the mightiest,
It becomes the throned monarch better than his crown.
His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,
An attribute to awe and majesty.
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings.
But mercy is above this sceptred sway,
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself.
And earthly power dost the become likest God's,
Where mercy seasons justice.
Therefore Jew,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That in the course of justice we all must see salvation,
We all do pray for mercy
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render the deeds of mercy.
I have spoke thus much to mittgate the justice of thy plea,
Which if thou dost follow,
This strict court of Venice
Must needs give sentance gainst the merchant there.




"Come into the Garden Maude"


"Come into the Garden Maude" 
Lord Tennyson
"Come into the Garden Maude" by Alfred Lord Tennyson is an exquisitely composed and crafted love poem. The story is that after a long ball, the poetic speaker (possibly Tennyson) is devotedly waiting in the garden for his wearied beauty. The theme is his undying devotion to always await her with longing heart, even in death:
Had I lain for a century dead;
Would start and tremble under her feet,
And blossom in purple and red.
The overall metaphor of the poem is a comparison of his beloved to the monarch of the garden, the Queen of the flowers:
Queen rose of the rosebud garden of girls
In gloss of satin and glimmer of pearls,
Queen lily and rose in one;
A prominent trope with a non-literal meaning that Tennyson uses issynæsthesia. This is a technique of imagery that mixes sensory categories producing images like velvet that hums or songs that skip. Tennyson writes about a "daffodil sky" and hair "sunning over with curls." The first joins tactile "daffodils" with ethereal, visible "sky." The second joins visible light of "sunning" with tactile "curls."
Tennyson makes use of pathetic fallacy, where "pathetic" means "empathetic" and able to "feel." Pathetic fallacy assigns human qualities of thought and feeling to nature, inanimate objects, and concepts (anthropomorphic fallacy assigns these to animals). Pathetic fallacy is related to personification because they are both subcategories of rhetoric reification. Though related, they have some differences: personification is not a rhetorical fallacy; it is an explicitly direct attribution of life qualities; pathetic fallacy is broader and more subtle than personification. An example of Tennyson's pathetic fallacy is:
The red rose cries, "She is near, she is near;"
And the white rose weeps, "She is late;"
The larkspur listens, "I hear, I hear;"
And the lily whispers, "I wait."
The meter and rhyme scheme have interesting variations. The base meter is anapestic trimeter (a pattern of ^ ^ / unstressed unstressed stressed for three repetitions ^ ^ / ^ ^ / ^ ^ /). However, since variation on the meter greets the reader at verse one, the first verse with pure anapestic trimeter is: "And^ the^ pla' / -net^ of^ Love' / is^ on^ high',". The opening line starts with an anapest but then has two varied feet of iambs: "For^ the^ black' / bat,^ Night,' / has^ flown',".
An alternate scansion call this three feet of anapests with comma pauses filling unstressed beats: "For^ the^ black' / bat^ ,^ Night' / ,^ has^ flown',". The pause is recognized as an integral part of rhythm in English poetics dating as back as the first use of the caesura as inBeowulf. Tennyson also varies the meter with anapestic tetrameter("Be^ -ginn' / -ing^ to^ faint' / in^ the^ light' / that^ she^ loves'") andiambs (as in the above): "My^ heart' / would^ hear' / her^ and^ beat',".
The rhyme scheme is also varied. The lines in the stanzas are in this pattern for ten stanzas: 5 / 6 / 6 / 8 / 6 / 6 / 8 / 6 / 8 / 8. The first stanza has a rhyme scheme abaca. The remaining rhyme scheme is alternating rhymes expanding progressively from a six line scheme of dedede at stanza 2, with variations for eight lines at stanzas 4, 7, 9, and 10 (e.g., stanza 4: hihihihi).




Although when Alfred Lord Tennyson's Maud was first published in 1855 it met with largely hostile reviews, it became an overwhelming success when its lines were excerpted for songs. While multiple different versions exist, dating from the year of the poem's publication to 1900, two of them have been particularly influential: Balfe's parlor song setting "Come into the Garden, Maud" (1857) and Somervell's song cycle Maud (1898). Balfe's setting became a staple of home performances, whereas Somervell's cycle is considered one of the masterpieces of the English art song tradition (Hold 91). Although both songs are well known, few scholars have addressed them from either a musicological or a literary standpoint. Those accounts which do exist argue that Balfe's setting and the corresponding section of Somervell's cycle perform a fairly naïve interpretation of the poem, taking the speaker's words of love for Maud as unproblematic and ignoring his madness altogether. These two divergent settings alter the narrative trajectory of the original, but their changes serve to emphasize the threat of violence and instability that undercuts the speaker's every line. In this deceptively simple and beautiful poem, the speaker misreads and misapplies the language of flowers and the garden, and so compulsively repeats his own phrases as to evacuate his troubadour-style lyrics of meaning and to expose them as merely the decoration for his latest obsession. Both Balfe and Somervell augment these poetic distortions in their musical settings. Balfe's setting can be played to sound like a naive love song, but its dissonances, unexpected harmonies, and constantly shifting tonal centers subtly undercut the speaker's sense of certainty and sanity, as does the text itself, making the song, like the poem, both participate in and disrupt the sentimental tradition. Somervell's version subtly avoids cadences and incorporates minor keys to convey the speaker's insanity from within the prison of his own mind.
Both settings feature lyric twenty-two from the end of Part I of Maud. The speaker has just discovered a rose floating in the rivulet that connects his house to the Hall where Maud, his beloved, lives. He believes that she has sent it to him as a message to wait for her in her rose garden where she will join him after a dance (to which he has not been invited). This segment occurs as he waits for her in the garden and ends as he spies her approaching.
In order to understand the nuances of the song settings, we need to examine the nuances of the poem itself. The poem, especially if excerpted and taken out of context, appears to be a traditional love lyric, in which the speaker invokes the pastoral tradition and extols the beauty of both his beloved and his surroundings. The speaker's conversations with flowers and his belief that he would still feel her presence even after death further cast the poem as part of the Victorian sentimental tradition, a tradition particularly associated with the domestic sphere. The simple rhyme scheme (ABABAB) makes the poem sound song-like, an effect furthered by the occasional anaphora (i.e. "All night" in the first and third lines of the third stanza).
Although the poem belongs to this tradition, it refuses to conform to convention, as the speaker's mental instability threatens the peace of the poem. His compulsive repetition and formal irregularities provide the first clues to his instability. Throughout the poem, he obsessively repeats himself: he chants "Come into the garden, Maud" twice in the first stanza and "to faint in the light" three times in the second stanza. This repetition occurs on individual words and phonemes as well as phrases:
Queen rose of the rosebud garden of girls,
Come hither, the dances are done,
In gloss of satin and glimmer of pearls,
Queen lily and rose in one;
Shine out, little head, sunning over with curls,
To the flowers, and be their sun. (53-58)
This passage conveys the echo chamber of the speaker's own mind; he becomes stuck on the words "rose," "queen," and "sun" as well as on alliteration within each line ("garden of girls," "dances are done," and "gloss . . . glimmer"). The rhyme scheme likewise conveys this obsessive repetition, as it consistently chimes with alternating AB rhymes throughout and echoes the speaker's inability to think about anything other than Maud. The speaker's mental instability manifests in the lyric's formal and rhythmic irregularities as well. The poem contains an alternating pattern of trimeter and tetrameter that only fully follows ballad meter in the middle five stanzas. The first three stanzas, as well as the final two stanzas, are predominantly trimeter, but incorporate one or two lines of tetrameter each at irregular intervals to disrupt the established order and perfectly convey the speaker's own disruptive personality. These metrical shifts, from trimeter to ballad meter and back to trimeter, rhythmically convey changes in the speaker's emotional state: it begins in trimeter as the speaker anxiously awaits Maud, becomes a ballad to echo the conventional pastoral allusions in which he assures the flowers that Maud will always be his, and returns to trimeter as the speaker again thinks about Maud's arrival. The final trimeter pattern is made apparent in Tennyson's one recorded recitation of the last stanza, in which he chants it in the musical equivalent of ¾ time. He reads it as though there were no endstops, strongly accentuating the three stresses in each line as though it were a demented waltz ("Come into the Garden, Maud"). These metrical shifts emphasize the speaker's overwhelming excitement at Maud's approach and demonstrate yet again that formal constraints are as ineffective in holding him back as are the walls that surround Maud's garden. The stanza's structure likewise cannot contain him: four of the eleven stanzas include two additional lines, and these stanzas occur with increasing frequency throughout the poem as though his overactive imagination bursts free from the preestablished pattern.
The garden includes flowers, such as the woodbine, jessamine, and acacia, and violet, which had deeper significance in the Language of Flowers, the Victorian secret code by which lovers communicated their thoughts; however, the speaker consistently misinterprets their significance, assuming they are natural symbols of the deep love that he and Maud supposedly share. The "woodbine," whose scent disperses throughout the garden, is frequently associated with "chains of love" (Seaton 181), a comparison that casts Maud and the speaker as practically imprisoned by this destructive love. The "jessamine" in the window casement represents "envy" (Seaton 180), an accurate depiction of the speaker's feelings about Maud and the dance, and therefore subverts the idea of the garden as idyllic. The "slender acacia" was a flower code for "platonic love," or "chaste love" (Seaton 168-169), certainly the opposite of what the speaker desires from their clandestine meeting. The speaker even misinterprets the violet. In the Language of Flowers, it represents modesty (Seaton 196-197), but the speaker likens it to a piece of fine jewelry: "He sets the jewel-print of your feet / In violets blue as your eyes" (41-42). By referencing violets in his comparison of her footprint to jewelry, the speaker's comparison casts the flowers as decorative or fancy rather than as modest. This disregard for societal codes and for the supposed intrinsic meaning of objects supports his own artistic purposes. The woodbine, jessamine, and violet, all flowers that appear in Milton's "Lycidas," also allude to the tradition of the pastoral elegy and underscore the threat of mortality that haunts the poem (142-148). In both poems, the speaker reads nature as an expression of his own desires: in "Lycidas," the flowers mourn as does the speaker, and in Maud, the speaker mistakenly assumes they celebrate his love. In fact, even before this section of the monodrama, the speaker misreads the flower he finds in the rivulet and claims that it "say[s] in odour and color 'Ah be / Among the roses tonight'" (848-849). Since he describes it as on a "blushing mission" (847), this garden rose is of a deep red color, so it signifies not a secret meeting but rather "bashful shame" (Greenaway 37).
The speaker likewise invokes religious language and iconography in ways that undermine his own message. As Alice Chandler has argued, the speaker repeatedly alludes to language from the Song of Solomon to describe not only Maud but also the garden itself (93). The speaker's description of the "woodbine spices" that are "wafted abroad" as well as the "musk of the rose" (5-6) echoes the similar Biblical description of the wind "blow[ing] upon [his] garden, that the spices thereof may flow out" (King James Bible, 4:16). This parallel conveys the speaker's desire to imagine Maud's garden as transcendent and his relationship with her as spiritual and ideal in spite of contrary evidence. In fact, as Inglesfield points out, the description of Maud as "Queen lily and rose in one" (56) comes from verse 2.1, in which the bride declares "I am the rose of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys" (122). Whereas the biblical text emphasizes the bride's embodiment and uses comparisons merely as metaphor, in this text Maud is completely absent, so the speaker uses words and his surroundings metaphorically to recreate transcendent union, unaware of the gap between his dream and the reality. His religious allusions again fall short when he mentions upon hearing Maud approach that "there has fallen a splendid tear / From the passion-flower at the gate" (59-60). The passion flower is so named because its physical characteristics supposedly corresponded to elements of Jesus's crucifixion. Since the lyric began with the speaker "here at the gate," the same location as the passion flower, he appears to project his own emotions onto the flower associated with Christ's passion and to view this ordeal as the equivalent. He also employs religious language at the poem's end when he insists that, were Maud to walk by, his "heart would hear her and beat / Were it earth in an earthy bed"; the image of "earth in an earthy bed" alludes to 1 Corinthians 15:47, in which Paul describes Adamic man as "of the earth, earthy" (King James Bible). In this allusion, the speaker casts Maud as the messiah who will enable his resurrection, a comparison that clearly demonstrates the desperation that underlies his admiration for Maud. This resurrection, in light of the speaker's allusions to Song of Solomon, also has decidedly sexual undercurrents, as though the pulsing from the "bed" originated from an organ other than his heart.
The speaker's very presence in Maud's enclosed rose garden is itself cause for concern. An enclosed garden, or Hortus conclusus, alludes to the Song of Solomon 4.12, in which, according to Christian interpretations, Mary's womb is a "garden enclosed," a comparison that associates these spaces with both purity and female sexuality. By extension, the speaker's presence in her garden becomes a violation, especially since he let himself in, incorrectly interpreting the flower as a symbolic invitation. His control over the space makes this violation more pronounced; his decision to invite her into her own garden further deprives her of agency and echoes an earlier occasion when he spied on her by climbing its walls. Instead of an innocent troubadour pledging his love, he becomes at best a stalker and at worst, a metaphorical rapist. His spying into the garden also alludes to Satan's illicit examination of Eden before he jumps over its walls in Paradise Lost (Book 4,174-181), a parallel that likewise condemns the speaker. His final words further clarify the associations between the garden and violence, sex, and imagination: he imagines his "dust . . .Would start and tremble under her feet, / And blossom in purple and red" (71-74). As Robert Inglesfield has argued, this conflation of flowers with bruises on a body "reinforces the suggestion of insane, sexually charged fantasy, and anticipates the physical violence and his collapse into insanity in Part II" (123). The image of the speaker's decomposing corpse creating new life in the form of blossoming flowers suggests that he sees himself as a part of the garden even after death. His imagined relationship with the garden, however, does not differ greatly from his current relationship with it, since he already reads the garden as an expression of his own desire and therefore as an extension of himself. This famous lyric from a larger work appears to be a sentimental love song while actually critiquing that categorization: it shows the speaker's dangerous obsession with Maud and the symbolic significance with which he imbues their relationship.





Symbolism


Symbolism
Symbolism, a loosely organised literary and artistic movement originated in France in the late 19th Century, spread to painting and the theatre, influenced the Irish, British and American literature of the 20th Century. These artists expressed their emotional experience through the subtle and suggestive use of highly symbolized language.
French symbolist poets include Stephane, Mallarme, Paul Verlaine, Arthur Rimbaud, Jules, Lafirgue, Paul Valery and Paul Claudel are considered to be the direct 20th Century heirs of the symbolist. Symbolism also represented a reaction against the objectives of realism and the increasingly influential movement of Impressionism. Symbolism originated in the revolt of certain French poets against rigid conventions governing both Technique and Theme in the traditional poetry. The symbolist wished to describe the fleeting immediate sensations of man’s inner life and experience. They attempted to evoke the ineffable intuitions and sense impressions of man’s inner life and to communicate the underlying mystery of the existence through a free and highly personal use of ‘metaphors and Images’, conveying the sate of the poet’s mind and  hint at the “dark and confined unity” of and inexpressible reality.
The symbolist like Verlaine and Rimbaud adopted Charles Baudelaire’s concept of the correspondence between the senses, combined with the Wagnerian ideal of a synthesis of the arts to produce an original conception of the Musical quality of poetry. The term “decadent” describing Baudelaire and others was replaced with the term “symboliste and symbolisme”. Many little symbolist reviews and magazines sprang up in the late 1880’s. Mallarme became the leader of the symbolist. Many of these poets resorted to the composition of prose poems and the use of Vers Libre (free verse). The symbolist movement also spread to Russia in 1894 through Vladmir, Aleksandr Bloc, Andrey Bely and Nikolay.
The symbolist movement in poetry reached its peak around 1890 and declined its popularity in 1900. Symbolist works had a strong and lasting influence on much British and American Literature in 20th Century. Symbolist theories bore fruit both in the poetry of WB Yeats and TS Eliot and in the modern novels of James Joyce and Virginia Wolf in which word harmonies and patterns of images predominant over the narrative and we also come across JK Huysmans.
The 20th Century American critic Edmund Willson’s survey of the Symbolistic Movement, “Axel’s Castle” (1931) is considered as classic of modern literary analysis and the authoritative study of the movement. Symbolism in painting took its direction from the poets and literary theorists of the movement. Dramatists also took their lead from the French Symbolist poets especially form Mallarme who opposed the dominant Realist Theatre which would evoke the hidden mystery of man and the universe.


(ST-PIUS X SHORT FILM) NARRATION

         VIRTUE AND VICE 
NARRATION AND VOICE OVER
                                                                     Dr. Annie Sunil



INTRODUCTION
   
                   Perhaps nowhere in the history of the Church is there a better example of a man possessed of so many of the saintly virtues – Piety, Charity, Deep Humility, Pastoral Zeal, and Simplicity. Than in one of the newest of God’s elect, St.Pius X. The inscription on his tomb in ST-PETER’S BASILICA is really a testimony to a life spent in the service of God

                                               BORN POOR AND HUMBLE OF HEART
UNDAUNTED CHAMPION OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH
ZEALOUS TO RESTORE ALL THING IN CHRIST
CROWNED A HOLY LIFE WITH A HOLY DEATH

His Father was a cobbler by trade, a caretaker of the city hall and the town’s Postmaster, Mother was Seamstress, and he is the eldest of eight children. As a Priest Father Sarto, 32years of age focused on helping the poor giving his own clothing and food to the needy; preach the Christian Doctrine to the young and the old, taught Catechism to the children, Sunday classes and then became the Bishop due to his many charities and sufficient votes in election, accepted and took the name of Pius X whispering “ THY WILL BE DONE “. As Pope he brought many changes, promoted reforms within the liturgy of Church modern music compositions were welcomed etc.

                                                 The end for the Christ-like Pius came peacefully on August 20, 1914 leaving his last will which read “ I WAS BORN POOR, I LIVED POOR, I DIE POOR” on June 3rd 1951, Pius X was declared blessed, and finally on May 29th 1954, amid the traditional pealings of the bells in the great churches of Rome, Sarto was canonized  a Saint of God. Pius XII bestowed the title of “ VENERABLE SERVANT OF GOD” upon Pius  X.

   The Piousians celebrate the feast of ST.PIOUS X on 21st august every year as the Institutional feast named after him. His Life is the source is the source of inspiration to us and his noble qualities a ray of light and hope  to enlighten our lives.



NARRATION 1

SCENE : YOUTH BEFORE THE ARGUMENT IN THE GARDEN.


Life, a beautiful gift of God has many phases. The first phase of birth is indeed a blessing to belong to a family. Samuel and Sarto cherished their childhood with the love of their Parents, Kith&Kin. The river of life flows smoothly and gaily with some ups and downs for 14 years crossing adolescent and college days. Now we see them as matured, independent individuals with different mind sets, attitude and profession. This metamorphosis rather transformation is clear crystal to our eyes!
(video edit river and the time wheel)

NARRATION 2


SCENE : BEFORE THE BEGGAR AND ASSISTANT SCENE


JESUS SAYS, “ I AM THE VINE AND YOU ARE THE BRANCHES. AS LONG AS YOU REMAIN IN ME AND I IN YOU, YOU BEAR MUCH FRUIT; BUT APART FROM ME YOU CAN DO NOTHING”

                     Samuel was carried away by the error of Lawless men and thus fell from his secured position. Sam loved everything – the cravings of sinful man, lust of his eyes and the boasting of what he has and does – all this will pass away. Samuel indulged in sexual immorality, impurity, greed of money, wealth, selfish ambition, envy, got drunk, lost self control, hatred, jealousy, fits of rage – all improper to God.
                                                    
                     Where as Sarto grew in the love, grace & knowledge of Lord The Almighty. He lived as a child of light in the Lord, in all goodness, righteous and truth, making the most of every opportunity, filled with the Holy Spirit…. Sharing God’s words with Psalms, Hymns and Spiritual songs doing good to all people. He practiced Love, Joy, Grace, Patience, Kindness, Faithfulness, Gentleness and Self Control.


NARRATION 3




One fine day, Samuel lost his senses and balance due heavy consumption of alcohol enters the CHAPEL and sees Father Sarto highlighting THE BEATITUDES, SERMON ON THE MOUNT.

BEATITUDES---

NARRATION 4

Jesus says “ LET NOT ANYONE LEAD YOU ASTRAY. HE WHO DOES WHAT IS SINFUL IS OF THE DEVIL AND HE WHO DOES WHAT IS RIGHT IS RIGHTEOUS”


Father Sarto became the Bishop due to his many charities and sufficient votes in election, accepted and took the name of Pius X whispering “ THY WILL BE DONE “. As Pope he brought many changes, promoted reforms within the liturgy of Church modern music compositions were welcomed etc.

                                                 The end for the Christ-like Pius came peacefully on August 20, 1914 leaving his last will which read “ I WAS BORN POOR, I LIVED POOR, I DIE POOR” on June 3rd 1951, Pius X was declared blessed, and finally on May 29th 1954, amid the traditional pealings of the bells in the great churches of Rome, Sarto was canonized  a Saint of God. Pius XII bestowed the title of “ VENERABLE SERVANT OF GOD” upon Pius  X.




Whatever you sow you reap the consequence!

Samuel who craved for fame, name and money, fell into sinful life, addicted to alcohol and drugs – lost his health, wealth, friends, and was left alone. He committed the seven deadly sins, had a pitiful death and was dragged mercilessly into the Hell by the demons.




CLIMAX





Background College anthem with the visuals of VIRTUES given by ST.PIUS


VIRTUES

MERCY AND LOVE : “ where Mercy, Love and Pity dwell
                                          There God is dwelling too.”
Christ is symbolic of love. Love is patient, Love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. The virtue of Mercy and Love is also seen in Shakespeare’s “ The Merchant Of Venice”
                           “ The quality of mercy is not strained
                              It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
                              It blesseth him that gives, and him that takes”


GENEROSITY: “  Generosity is the flower of justice
                               And the rarest of all virtues”
This virtue exalts us to be magnanimous, selfless and altruistic, a well wisher of others.
                  “ When you give to the needy, do not let your right hand know what your left hand is          doing so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

FAITH : “ FAITH IS A LIVING AND UNSHAKABLE CONFIDENCE, A BELIEF IN THE GRACE OF GOD, SO ASSURED THAT A MAN WOULD DIE A THOUSAND DEATHS FOR ITS SAKE”
Faith and devotion help us realize that the care of God is a great thing. If a man believes it at heart it plucks the burden of sorrow.


HUMILITY : “ WE COME NEAREST TO THE GREAT, WHEN WE ARE GREAT IN HUMILITY AND BLESSED ARE THE HUMBLE, THEY SHALL BE EXALTED”

This meekness has helped many great philosophers and thinkers to reach the heights of genius. We should be humble in our thought, word and deed.
“ PRIDE BRINGETH FALL, HUMILITY ELEVATES”


SIMPLICITY : THIS NOBLE VIRTUE IS SYNONYMOUS WITH OUR PATRON SAINT who believed that to reduce the complexity of life , it is important to eliminate the needless wants of life, thus the labors of life reduce themselves.  His simple life teaches us that Beauty of style, harmony, grace and good rhythm depend on simplicity.


FORTITUDE: “ LIFE IS MOSTLY OF FROTH AND BUBBLE,
                           TWO THINGS STAND LIKE STONE,
                            KINDNESS IN ANOTHER’S TROUBLE,
                            COURAGE IN YOUR OWN “
          
                This proves that we are strong , our character will speak for itself


INTELLIGENCE AND CONFIDENCE : “ AN HONEST HEART BEING THE FIRST BLESSING,
 A KNOWING HEAD IS THE SECOND,
AND CONFIDENCE THE THIRD
This blend of intelligence and confidence specially needed for the youth to face challenges , is epitomized in our patron ST.Pious X


FEAR OF THE LORD : “ FEAR OF THE LORD IS THE BEGINNING OF KNOWLEDGE “
  This is the feeling of amazement before God, who is Omnipresent and  Omnipotent , and whose friendship we do not want to loose


PEACE : “ LOVE PAVES WAY FOR UNDERSTAND, UNDERSTANDING TO PEACE , PEACE TO UNITY “

Unity in the families and countries will lead to world solidarity. We should treat one another as spiritual brethren; Toleration should be transformed into love , to achieve unity and peace , co-operation, racial harmony, among all who believe in God as we are one family under God



              These Cardinal and Theological Virtues  embodied in the great personality of our patron ST.PIOUS X are Praiseworthy and Significant. We should transfer them into deed or action so that they would make our lives Pure, Meaningful and Worthwhile








FUNCTION OF CRITICISM – ARNOLD


FUNCTION OF CRITICISM – ARNOLD

Arnold confirms that the creative power of poetry requires ideas and material to provide it with inspiration and achieve success. These ideas nourishes the creative power. The critical effort tries to create cultural environment rich with ideas.

He goes on to equate the emotional experience of writing criticism with the emotional experience of writing creative work. He intends to undermines typical opinion against criticism. He defends criticism against the opinion that believes that it serves no purpose, and that those who criticize cannot write something creative themselves.

He compares between the success of Goethe and that of Byron. Arnold says that both of them had a great productive power, but Goethe was nourished by great critical effort which provided the required material for his work. Lord Byronpossessed the same gift but was less productive because he found no rich cultural background and material. Byron lacked critical efforts.

 Thus, he sees that the poet should understand the world about which he writes. Understanding the world needs critical effort and analysis. 

Arnold sees that real criticism is essentially the exercise of the quality of curiosity. Curiosity is the disinterested desire for knowledge in all fields. It is an instinct that urges man to seek knowledge for the sake of knowledge. The creative activity must be preceded by criticism. Criticism paves the way for creative activity.

Disinterestedness: Arnold sees that the indispensable rule of English criticism is disinterestedness or objectivity. It also means independence of judgement.

How can criticism show disinterestedness?
·         Criticism should follow the law of its own nature which is freedom. Criticism should be a free activity which is not subject to any external influence.
·         Criticism should refuse to submit to political or practical consideration.
·         Criticism should serve nothing but itself. 
What is the business of criticism?
·         The business of criticism is to know the best that is known and thought in the world.
·         Moreover, it should spread this knowledge to create a flow of new ideas.
·         Its business is to practise the function with strict honesty and sense of duty. He opposes the flexible honest in criticism.
What does hinder criticism?
·         Arnold sees that practical considerations hinder faithful criticism and suffocates it. Criticism should be free of these considerations. It should be firstly a free play of mind. The free play of mind is much more important than any practical ends.
Spiritual Function of Criticism:

The spiritual function of criticism is to protect man from a self-satisfaction that holds him back. It lends him to perfection by introducing his mind to excellent ideas, beauty and fitness. Non-objective practical criticism makes man blind to shortcomings and faults in their practice. This will lead to narrow-mindedness.

Arnold specifies certain activity for criticism. Criticism should refrain itself from the sphere of practical life. It involves itself in a slow and obscure work. The common people never have the enthusiastic motive of seeing things as they are, so inadequate ideas will satisfy them.

Scepticism was a direct result of the new intellectual theories of Darwin. Darwin's theory of evolution lead to scepticism about religious beliefs and Christian faith. His theory contradicts the story of creation in the Bible.

Arnold advocates the importance of education. He believed that schools were essential location for civilising and enlightening the next generation of lower classes. He anticipated that this generation will occupy the political positions. This shows that he has a good vision because the Victorian age witnessed the gradual rise of the middle class. This also reflects his belief that proper education is one of the best equipments to have a better life. It is a means by which man can improve his life and position.

Arnold defines criticism as the disinterested endeavour to learn and propagates the best that is know and thought in the world. He means that it is an objective and unbiased attempt to reveal the best ideas that are tackled.

Arnold provides criticism with an important social function and paved the way for its institutionalization. He means to make criticism a genre for study at school.

Arnold believes that poetry is in its essence a criticism of life. The poet should apply his ideas to life. Poetry should give an answers to the question how to live. 

Arnold believes that criticism is responsible for generating the context of ideas and high standards that are required for the production of literature.

In his book Culture and Anarchy, he shows his aim at raising the impulse to the development of the whole man. He wants to create harmony among all parts of man to make him reach perfection. In this book, he gave answers to most of the questions that engaged people and writers' minds such as what kind of education the one should receive. These answers came at a moment in English history when anarchy and social unrest prevailed. He shows that the best persons would be critics who are unbiased thoughtful and against fanaticism. They aspire to perfection. In Culture and Anarchy, he asserts the value of poetry on attitude to the cultural anarchy of his age.

Arnold is mainly interested in the personality and moral tone. He was criticised for focusing on moral tone. He enthusiastically defends the function of criticism and literature against its enemies. He defends culture as "a study of perfection." He believes that culture is seductive and harmonious not conflictual. Arnold sees that criticism requires flexibility and curiosity. The critic should be also open to life and a true evaluation. 


History Plays Sem 3- Unit 1

                                                                                       HISTORY PLAYS A  history play  (sometimes known as a ...