Drama of Ideas
What is known as ‘drama of Ideas’? How do you classify Arms and
The Man as a ‘drama of ideas?
Drama of Ideas or the drama of social criticism
in the real sense is a modern development. A number of contemporary problems
and evils are subjected to discussion and searching examinations and criticism
in these plays. Thus in it, the structure and characterization are of
subordinate importance; it ids the ‘discussion’ that counts. Ibsen and then
Shaw, Galsworthy and Granville Barker were the chief exponents of this
realistic drama of ideas.
To Shaw, drama was preeminently a medium for
articulating his own ideas and philosophy. He enunciated the philosophy of life
force which he sought to disseminate through his dramas. Thus Shavian plays are
the vehicles for the transportation of ideas, however, propagandizing they may
be. Shaw wanted to cast his ideas through discussions.
Out of the discussions in the play Arms and The Man Shaw breaks the idols of love
and war. The iconoclast Shaw pulls down all false gods which men live, love
admire and adore. By a clever juxtaposition of characters and dialogues, Shaw
shatters the romantic illusions about war and war heroes Shaw’s message is that
war is no longer a thing of banners and glory, as the nineteenth century
dramatist saw it, but a dull and sordid affair of brutal strength and callous
planning out. The dialogues of Bluntschli, Riana and Sergius go to preach this
message with great success. Here to quote Sergius who says, “War is a hollow
sham like love.” One thing however be remembered that in Arms and The Man, Mr.
Shaw does not, as some imagine attack war. He is not Tolstoy an in the least.
What he does is to denounce the sentimental illusion that gathers around war.
“Fight if you will”, says he ‘but for goodness’ sake don’t strike picturesque
attitudes in the limelight about it. View it as one of the desperately irrational
things of life that may, however, in certain circumstances be a brutal
necessity. Bluntschli is the very mouth piece of the play that exposes the
dreamful reality of war. There is a lot of learning in the disillusionment of
Riana and Sergius.
But this is not the whole message Shaw intends to convey
through his Arms and The Man. In the play he has taken a
realistic view not only of war and heroism but of love and marriage. He has
taken a realistic view of life as a whole. He has blown away the halo of romance
that surrounds human life as a whole. His message in this play is, therefore,
the destruction not only of the conventional conception of the heroic soldier
but of the romantic view of marriage, nay, of life as a whole. He pleads for
judging everything concerning human life from a purely realistic point of view.
This is the message he conveys through the play, Arms and TheMan. The hero
Bluntschli here serves the mouth piece of the author. He is the postal of level
-headedness that sees through emptiness of romantic love and romantic heroism.
He towers about all others and shatters all the pet theories and so called high
ideas, and converts Raina and Sergius to his own views and succeeds in life
because he faces facts and his no romantic illusions about him.
Further, as all the propaganda plays go Arms and The Man lacks action and instead of
action it contains plenty of dramatic dialogues. It is not a lie if we say the Arms and The Man Shaw’s a perfect combination of the
elements of action and ‘discussion’. The conversation between Raina and Captain
Bluntschli, for example in the act-I, is extremely lively and through the mouth
of the chocolate cream soldier. Shaw gives expression to his own heresies about
the glories of warfare. The fugitive soldier talks to the universality of the
flaying instinct, but his talk is not an end in itself. He argues only with a
view to persuading Raina to give him shelter and to protect him from the raids
of Bulgarian soldiers. Thus there is not a scrap of discussion for the sake of
discussion. The action of the drama require that Raina’s hatred of a cowardly
should be disarmed, her romantic notions blasted and sympathy and pity aroused.
As soon as this end has been achieved, the tired soldier drops down fast
asleep. He instinctively realizes that he has become Riana’s poor dear; and
there is no need for further argument.
"Drama of Ideas", pioneered by George Bernard Shaw, is a type of
discussion play in which the clash of ideas and hostile ideologies reveals the
most acute problems of social and personal morality. This type of comedy is
different from the conventional comedy such as
Shakespearean comedies. In a Drama of Ideas
there is a little action but discussion. Characters are only the vehicles of
ideas. The conflict which is the essence of drama is reached through the
opposing ideas of different characters. The aim of Drama of Ideas is to
educate people through entertainment.
Arms and the Man is an excellent example of the Drama
of Ideas. Here very little happens except discussion. The plot is built up with
dynamic and unconventional ideas regarding war and love. Shaw criticizes theromantic notion of war and love prevailing in the
contemporary society. Unlike the conventional comedies, here characters are engaged
in lengthy discussion and thus bring out ideas contrary to each other.
No comments:
Post a Comment